You know, I'm something of a rodent scientist myself.

User Image

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

You may know the trick of checking price in relation to weight, rather than full price, at a supermarket, to account for different pack sizes, but have you ever thought of applying that same metric to gaming mice? Me neither, until our Dave spotted such a rubric on Amazon. The Turtle Beach Burst II Air Amazon listing has a price-to-ounce ratio, and that got me thinking: which mouse would offer the best price-to-gram ratio?

Yes, it may be a bit silly to value price relative to weight, as it's favouring cheap but heavy mice, and it might mean that some ultralight mice get the short end of the stick, and some might argue that price-to-gram tells you less about whether you should buy the mouse than price by itself, but you've gotta take that one up with Mr Bezos. I'm just the messenger, and as we all know, the messenger never gets shot.

And most scientists are unappreciated in their time.

As a fierce rodent scientist, I fear this specific study needs much more than just working out the weight-to-price ratio. Thus, my own personal rubric was born, an unholy alliance of two different scores that are then averaged together.

First, the price-to-weight ratio. Here, I grabbed the weight of the mouse and the MSRP, then assigned it a grams-per-dollar value. Some mice have slightly different weights (like the SteelSeries Rival Pro white and black models, which are one gram different), so I took the lowest available. From here, I graphed every pick on a scale and assigned a value based on how well they rank. The mouse at the very bottom of this graph would be assigned 100%, and the mouse on the total opposite end would get 0%.

In the name of unadulterated overkill, for science, my method was to get the difference between the highest- and lowest-value mouse, then divide that difference by 100 to get 1% (0.034), and then calculate the difference between either end and the scored mouse in measures of 0.034.

Finally, to account for quality, I would grab our review score (which does mean this specific study can only happen with mice we've reviewed). The combination of these two gets you what I am tentatively calling the PC Gamer price-to-weight-to-value-to-quality score, or the James score for short. Catchy name, I know.

The PC Gamer Circuit Breaker newsletter breaks down the latest PC gaming tech, and finds you the best deals on the best products

Yes, this does mean that the data is held back specifically by mice we've reviewed, but I can live with that. Anyway, here are the numbers.

Price ($)

Weight (g)

Cost per gram

Price-to-weight value (%)

Review score (%)

Final Score (%)

SteelSeries Rival Pro

180

53

3.4

16

89

52.5

AngryMiao AM Infinity. 97

189

47

4.0

0

88

44

Razer Naga V3 Pro

180

112

1.61

69

84

76.5

Asus ROG Harpe II Extreme Edition 20

260

82

3.17

23

72

47.5

Pulsar Feinmann F01 Noctua Edition

180

73

2.47

44

73

58.5

Mchose K7 V2 Ultra+

89

59

1.51

72

89

80.5

Asus ProArt Mouse MD301

100

100

1

87

71

79

Logitech Mobi Fold

80

79

1.01

87

65

76

Logitech G305 X Superlight

80

59

1.36

76

70

73

MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K

100

66

1.52

72

72

72

Protoarc EM25

50

User Image

90

0.56

100

40

70

Zowie EC2-DW

150

60

1.67

67

82

74.5

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2

100

68

1.47

73

84

78.5

Razer Viper V4 Pro

160

49

3.26

21

95

58

Mchose G3 V2

34

59

1.74

65

84

74.5

Pulsar X3 Crazylight Mini

156

43

3.63

10

89

49.5

Corsair Sabre V2 Pro Wireless CF

200

55

3.64

9

68

38.5

Mchose L7 Pro+

60

43

1.40

75

85

80

Razer Cobra Hyperspeed

99

62

1.6

69

86

77.5

Logitech G Pro X2 Superstrike

180

59

3.05

27

95

61

8BitDo Retro R8

50

77

0.65

97

87

92

Corsair Sabre V2 Pro Ultralight

100

36

2.78

35

92

63.5

Razer Deathadder V4 Pro

170

56

3.04

27

90

58.5

User Image

Glorious Model O ...Read more: Full article on www.pcgamer.com

What do you think about this?